Home/Catalog/DAF flotation units

DAF flotation units

Dissolved air flotation is a separation process in which suspended and emulsified impurities are carried to the surface by air bubbles released from a supersaturated solution. The floated layer is removed by a mechanical scraper and the clarified water leaves from the lower part of the chamber. The technology works with whatever is lighter than water or can be brought into that state by a reagent.

  1. Screens and balancing
  2. Reagent dosing
  3. DAF flotation units
  4. Biological treatment
  5. Sludge dewatering

Principle

How it works

Part of the already clarified water is drawn off for recirculation and saturated with air in a saturator at 4–6 bar. The solubility of a gas is proportional to its partial pressure, so under pressure the water takes up many times more air than it would under atmospheric conditions. On throttling at the chamber inlet the solution becomes supersaturated and the excess air is released as bubbles tens of micrometres across.

A bubble attaches to the surface of a particle and forms an aggregate whose mean density is lower than that of water. The aggregate rises; the rise velocity follows Stokes' law and depends on the size of the aggregate and on the density difference. Float collects on the surface of the chamber and is removed by a chain scraper into the sludge launder, while clarified water is drawn from the lower part of the chamber.

A bubble can attach only to a hydrophobic surface, so reagent treatment is part of the process rather than an addition to it. In the coagulation and flocculation chambers ahead of the flotation chamber, a coagulant and a flocculant are dosed: the first neutralises the charge of colloidal particles and enlarges them, the second binds the microflocs into structures that hold bubbles. Residence time in those chambers and mixing intensity are set by calculation: excessive mixing breaks the flocs, insufficient mixing prevents them from forming.

Recycle flow is a design value that determines how much air enters the chamber. In the catalogue models it amounts to a noticeable share of the capacity: DAF-5 takes 2 m³/h at a capacity of 4–5 m³/h, DAF-100 takes 50 m³/h at 95–100 m³/h. These volumes pass continuously through the recycle pump and the saturator and account for most of the unit's energy consumption.

The capacity of a flotation chamber is limited not only by volume but also by the hydraulic loading on the surface area and by the solids loading. That is why the size is selected for the design flow rather than "with a margin": well below the design flow the distribution within the chamber and the sludge removal regime break down, while above it the residence time shortens and part of the aggregates fail to rise.

Principle

The counterintuitive part

Flotation is not settling in reverse. A particle rises not because its density is lower than that of water but because a bubble has attached to it and the resulting aggregate has become buoyant relative to the medium. Attachment is possible only where the surface is sufficiently hydrophobic, and it is reagent treatment that makes it so. It follows that a flotation unit without a matched coagulant does not merely "work less well": for most parameters it does not work at all, and the effluent passes through the chamber virtually unchanged.

Bubble size matters more than bubble count. Bubbles tens of micrometres in diameter are the effective ones: they rise slowly, stay in contact with particles longer and have time to attach. Large bubbles rise quickly, their probability of attachment is low, and the upward flow they create stirs the contents of the chamber and breaks up aggregates that have already formed. For that reason increasing the air supply above the design value degrades treatment rather than improving it, and the saturator regime belongs among the parameters that should not be altered arbitrarily.

A flotation unit concentrates pollutants rather than destroying them. The removed matter does not disappear: it passes into float amounting to some one to three per cent of the effluent flow at 94–97 % moisture. In dry solids that is little; in transport volume it is substantial, because what is hauled is mostly water. Sludge dewatering is therefore planned together with the flotation unit: without it the task has not been solved but moved to the next stage of waste handling.

Practice

What that gives in practice

A flotation unit is installed ahead of biological treatment. For activated sludge, fats and light solids are not a nutrient substrate but a load: they impair mass transfer, promote sludge bulking and reduce the performance of structures designed for dissolved organics.

On a single site the unit serves as the step that brings effluent within the discharge limits of the municipal sewer for suspended solids, fats and part of the COD. Parameters relating to dissolved matter remain unchanged, and where the exceedance concerns them, flotation alone does not resolve the task.

The reagent regime is established for the specific effluent by jar testing. The type and dose of coagulant, the need for a flocculant and the required pH correction are determined. Effluents from one industry are similar in character but not identical: differences in recipe, washing schedule and detergents change the dose several-fold.

The unit is supplied skid-mounted and comprises coagulation and flocculation chambers, the flotation chamber, a saturator, a recycle pump, a scraper mechanism and a dosing station. The site has to provide the effluent inlet, outlets for clarified water and sludge, power supply and access for servicing the scraper.

Performance is assessed from comparable samples at the inlet and the outlet, not from the appearance of the clarified water. For fats and petroleum products the achievable reduction is usually 80–95 %, for suspended solids 70–90 %; the actual figures depend on the reagent regime, the temperature and the stability of the effluent composition.

Limits

When you need it

  • Food production: dairies, meat and fish processing plants, vegetable oil production — effluent with a high content of fat and protein.
  • Vehicle washes, transport depots and yards where petroleum products are present in the effluent.
  • Discharge limits for suspended solids and fats exceeded at the connection to the municipal sewer.
  • Protection of the biological stage from slug loads that disrupt the operation of activated sludge.
  • A need to reduce the load ahead of biological treatment and thereby the size of the structures that follow it.
  • Schemes with partial water reuse, where the bulk of suspended and emulsified matter has to be removed before polishing.

When it will not help

  • Where the exceedance concerns dissolved matter — salts, ammonium nitrogen, dissolved organics. Flotation has no effect on them; biological treatment, sorption or membrane processes are required.
  • Where the solids are predominantly mineral and heavy and the flow is steady. Gravity settling then delivers a comparable result at lower capital and operating cost.
  • Where the plant cannot organise the reagent side. Without a matched dose, regular checks and a reagent stock the unit loses its performance within the first weeks of operation.
  • Where the handling of float has not been resolved. Its volume is small but its moisture is high, and dewatering or haulage has to be part of the design.
  • Where the effluent arrives extremely unevenly and no balancing tank is provided. Flotation is more sensitive to slug loads than most mechanical stages, because the reagent is dosed to flow and has no time to act on the peak.

Practice

Typical cases

Feed
Dairy effluent: fats around 300 mg/l, suspended solids 500 mg/l, COD 2,500 mgO₂/l, slugs after equipment washdown, pH between 6 and 11 within a shift.
Task
Meet the municipal sewer discharge limits for fats and suspended solids.
Scheme
Screen → balancing tank with mixing → pH correction → coagulant and flocculant dosing → flotation unit → outfall; float to dewatering.
Result
Fats and suspended solids reduced to the required values at a stable reagent regime. The balancing tank is mandatory here: without it a slug passes the chamber faster than flocculation can develop.
Feed
Truck wash effluent: petroleum products, mineral solids and sand, surfactants, flow around 10 m³/h with pronounced peaks.
Task
Prepare the effluent for discharge and return part of the water for reuse in washing.
Scheme
Grit trap → balancing tank → reagent treatment → flotation unit → filtration → reuse tank.
Result
Petroleum products and suspended solids pass into the float. Surfactants are removed only in part and have to be checked against their own limit; the grit trap is mandatory, since the mineral fraction does not float and accumulates in the chamber.
Feed
Meat processing effluent ahead of an on-site treatment plant: high COD load, substantial protein and fat content, effluent temperature up to 35 °C.
Task
Remove the suspended load ahead of the biological stage and secure stable operation of the activated sludge.
Scheme
Sieve → balancing tank → reagent treatment → flotation unit → biological treatment → sludge dewatering.
Result
The suspended share of the COD is reduced and the sludge is protected from fat loading. The dissolved share of the COD remains and is removed by the biological stage, for which the flotation unit acts as a stabilising step.

The cases are typical examples, not site reports.

Innovations

Our developments for this stage

Scheme

Place in the scheme

A flotation unit is not applied as a stage in its own right. It requires a screen or sieve ahead of it to retain coarse matter and a balancing tank to even out flow and composition: the reagent side is tuned to a certain range, and leaving that range means losing performance at precisely the moment of peak load.

The dosing station is part of the unit. Coagulant and flocculant doses are established by jar testing and revised when production changes; where the pH deviates substantially, a correction unit is introduced, since the effectiveness of coagulants is confined to a narrow range.

Downstream of the unit the scheme divides into two lines. Clarified water goes to discharge or to biological treatment where limits on dissolved matter are not met. The float goes to dewatering: hauling sludge at over 94 % moisture is not economically justified.

For cold sites the temperature regime is taken into account: air solubility and water viscosity both depend on temperature, and operation away from design values changes the saturator regime and the rise velocity of the aggregates.

Scheme

Automation and control

  • Reagent dosing proportional to effluent flow and, where required, corrected by pH. A fixed dose at variable flow means either excess reagent consumption or a failure of treatment at peak load.
  • Maintenance of saturator pressure. It governs the amount of dissolved air and the dispersion of the bubbles, that is, the principal parameters of the process.
  • Control of the scraper mechanism on a timer, with the interval set from the actual thickness of the float layer. Infrequent removal contaminates the clarified water again; frequent removal raises the moisture of the sludge.
  • Monitoring of chamber level and recycle pump operation. A stopped pump ends flotation while effluent keeps arriving: this is a failure with no outward sign, detected only by the control system or by laboratory checks.
  • Recording of effluent and reagent flows. Without those data neither the regime can be justified to the regulator nor the cause of a deviation established from analyses.

Operation

Running it

Energy

Specific energy consumption is of the order of 0.1–0.3 kWh per cubic metre of effluent. Most of it goes to the recycle pump and the compressor that saturate the water with air; the scraper and stirrer drives consume substantially less. In the catalogue models the total installed drive power ranges from 3 to 15 kW depending on the size, which in continuous operation makes a predictable and comparatively modest item of operating cost next to the price of chemicals.

Consumables

  • Coagulant: consumption is established by jar testing and revised when raw materials, recipe or washing schedule change
  • Flocculant: dosed into the flocculation chamber, requires solution make-up and accurate concentration control
  • pH correction chemicals where the effluent is markedly acidic or alkaline
  • Mechanical spares: scraper chain and flights, bearing assemblies, seals, saturator nozzles
  • Laboratory analyses of inlet and outlet: they are the basis both for tuning the dosing and for reporting to the regulator

What goes to drain

Float is produced at some one to three per cent of the effluent flow at 94–97 % moisture. It contains fats, suspended solids and reagent flocs, that is, everything removed from the water. Further handling follows from its composition: dewatering on a screw or belt press, storage and haulage by a licensed contractor or, for certain food industries, transfer for processing. The hazard class and the permitted route are determined by the effluent composition, not by the type of equipment.

Sizing

Sizing

What we account for

  • Effluent composition: fats and petroleum products, suspended solids, COD and BOD, pH, temperature, surfactant content
  • Flow: average and maximum hourly, daily variation, the nature of slugs after equipment washdown
  • Outlet requirements: municipal sewer discharge limits or the requirements of the next treatment stage
  • Jar test results: type and dose of coagulant and flocculant, the need for pH correction
  • Route for the float: dewatering on site or haulage, and the availability of a receiving contractor
  • Site characteristics: room for installation and for servicing the scraper, ceiling height, power supply, sludge routing
  • Prospective change of production: higher output changes both the flow and the character of the effluent, and the size is chosen for the design regime rather than the extreme one

What a wrong choice costs

  • Sizing on flow with no effluent analysis. The same model at a dairy and at a vehicle wash requires different reagents and yields different results, although the data sheets are identical.
  • No balancing tank. A slug passes the chamber faster than flocs can form, and treatment fails at the moment of maximum load, that is, exactly when it is needed most.
  • A reagent regime adopted by analogy, without jar testing. The consequences run both ways: too low a dose fails to achieve treatment, too high a dose raises reagent consumption and the volume of sludge produced.
  • No provision for dewatering the float. The volume is small, but at over 94 % moisture what is hauled away is mostly water, and operating costs exceed the estimate.
  • Flotation applied instead of biological treatment where the exceedance concerns dissolved matter. Such a decision shows up in the very first analyses and calls for reworking the design.
  • Choosing a larger size "as a margin" without regard to the lower bound. Well below the design flow the distribution within the chamber and the sludge removal regime break down, and the unit performs worse than a smaller model would.

Sizing

What we need for a calculation

  • An effluent analysis report: fats and petroleum products, suspended solids, COD, BOD, pH, temperature, surfactants
  • Flow: average and maximum hourly, the production schedule, the nature and frequency of slugs
  • The discharge point for clarified water and the limits applied to it, or the composition of subsequent treatment stages
  • The existing scheme: screens, grease traps, balancing tank, any biological treatment in operation
  • The intended route for the float: dewatering on site or haulage
  • Site characteristics: floor area and ceiling height, power supply, effluent inlet and sludge outlet arrangements
  • The possibility of jar testing on the actual effluent and the timing for providing a sample

Questions

Questions

Are reagents necessary, or does the unit work without them?

Reagents are part of the process. A bubble attaches only to a hydrophobic surface, and it is the coagulant and the flocculant that create one while enlarging the particles to a size at which the aggregate rises within the residence time of the chamber. Without reagent treatment only free-floating fat is removed, and the figures for suspended solids and COD remain practically unchanged.

Does a flotation unit replace biological treatment?

No. Flotation removes suspended and colloidal matter from the water and turns it into sludge, whereas dissolved organics, ammonium nitrogen and mineral salts pass through the unit unchanged. In a typical scheme the flotation unit sits ahead of the biological stage and reduces the load on it, which allows the structures to be smaller and their operation more stable.

How much sludge is produced and how is it handled?

The volume is some one to three per cent of the effluent flow at 94–97 % moisture. The sludge is dewatered on a screw or belt press and then transferred to a licensed contractor in accordance with its hazard class. Handling has to be planned together with the choice of the unit; otherwise what the plant hauls away is mostly water.

Can a larger size be selected as a margin?

A margin on flow is justified within the limits set by the hydraulic loading of the chamber. Flotation also has a lower bound: well below the design flow the distribution of the flow and the sludge removal regime break down, and performance falls. It is sounder to build the margin into the balancing tank and the duty cycle and to select the size for the design flow.

Flotation unit or lamella clarifier?

The choice follows from the character of the solids. A lamella clarifier works with particles denser than water: mineral solids, scale, sand. It does not remove fats, oils or light flocs. Flotation is designed precisely for those and requires a reagent side. Where the effluent carries both, the stages are applied in sequence.

How does operation change in winter?

Temperature affects the process in two ways. As the temperature falls the solubility of air increases, which is favourable in itself, but the viscosity of water rises, the rise velocity of the aggregates falls, and coagulation becomes less effective and calls for a higher reagent dose. For unheated sites insulation and heating of the dosing equipment are provided: freezing of the reagent solutions stops the unit entirely.

Next

Start a project

Let's talk about your project

Tell us about your site — our engineer will prepare a process design, a specification and a quotation within one business day.

✓ Free calculation✓ Site visit

By submitting the form you agree to the processing of your personal data. Privacy Policy